Unknown

Joined

180 Experience
1 Lesson Completed
0 Questions Solved

Activity

Also In the first example, I simplifid too much usage item entity.
It has more than 4 ~ 6 different column from other types of invocie items. (subscription item, and proration)
So it's not really like 20 ~ 30 columns.
I think I can still use STI but what do you think?

@Chris

Thank you so much for the detailed answer. I don't have anyone to ask in our team. (Those who have really good understanding of OR mapping.)

Yes, it's true that STI is not only RoR thing and it's introduced in the book by Bill Karwin.

Also it's introduced PofEAA too!
So it's absolutely decent pattern IMO.

In here the main question is that possible to change to polymorphic from STI in the future?

In an example,

You can see three types of entities.
-subscription item

  • proration
  • usage item

So for implementation,
subscription item and proration are similar, but usage item is a little different from the others.

(So you seem to ues Stripe API as GoRails billing processor. What I does is developing billing system in our application with Stripe.)

We have a mapping layer that sits between the Stripe API and your own internal invoice system to

  • generate a completely custom receipt
  • store data for an invoice (who get charged for what items)

subscription item and proration
in the invoice.payment.succeedd webhook, we can just handle and stroe the data. (like which inoivce has which items.)

usage item is basically,

  • for extra optional items on top of the subscription (subscription + something)
  • Stripe ususally has the cicle that after they send invoice.created webhook, we could add items to the invoice for 1 hour before invoce.payment_succeed/faild trigers (except the very first invoice)
  • In invoice.created webhook we can fetch the usage_items and add the invoice, so that's why it's belongs to an account entity.

I wish I could articulate the situation, and you could understand.

However usage_item is not used for now. Maybe in the future.

I totally agree with what you said.

start simple and just pick one that seems most intuitive to you right now.

For now I could delete unused stuff (usage item)

So the question here is possible to change to polymorphic from STI in the future?

you can always write migrations to move data into another structure and change your models along with it

It's always scarly to change the db shceme especially table once the application runs in production.
I'd love to hear how I could achieve it efficiently. (Maybe little off the topic, and I'm very new to RoR)
It's okay to restructure the database schema, and what about the data in db, and also downtime to deal with that.

Thanks!

EDIT

I'd love to hear the reason why I could use some design.
Maybe those types pros and cons.

As far as I know,

If I apply STI

That leads many NULLable columns, but RoR supports STI. So it's easy
to use.

If I apply polymorphic with has_one

It stills the rails way but the original polymorphic definition is
different. It should have has_many relationship instead of
has_one. Also it's impossible to add foreign key.

If I apply Class table inheritance,

It's more efficient for relational database, but it's not rails way.

Hi I watch your tuts and it's pretty helpful. Always thanks!
I have some question about database design.

There are three types of invoice items with following tables

1) SubscriptionItems,

2) Prorations,

3) UsageItems,

Those have the same attributes below

invoice_id
amount
stripe_invoie_id

However

only SubscriptionItem and Proration

period_start_at
period_end_at

and only Proration and UsageItem has

title

and only UsageItem has

uuid
account_id
description

To achieve this model I've been using polymorphic relation.

class InvoiceItem < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :invoice
  belongs_to :itemable, polymorphic: true
end

class SubscriptionItem < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :plan
  has_one :invoice_item, as: :itemable
end

class UsageItem < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :account
  has_one :invoice_item, as: :itemable
end

class Invoice < ActiveRecord::Base
  belongs_to :account
  has_many :invoice_items
end

class Account < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :invoices
  has_many :usage_items
end

For now it works.
However As far as I understand polymorphic should have has_many relation.
So this resides in the middle of Polymorphic and STI.
Because those three types of invoice items are always be subscriptionitem, proration, or usageitem.

It's hard decision that I could keep using this models or use STI instead?
Or Should I use class table inheritance should be fit?

logo Created with Sketch.

Ruby on Rails tutorials, guides, and screencasts for web developers learning Ruby, Rails, Javascript, Turbolinks, Stimulus.js, Vue.js, and more. Icons by Icons8

© 2020 GoRails, LLC. All rights reserved.